Category: Dating and Relationships
Threesomes...Why or Why Not?? Would you if your spouse or bf/gf want to?? I personally would NOT..i am greedy with MY MAN therefore i wouldn't want no chick to get what is mine. d: Plus three is a crowd..lol.
It's not something I'd ever do; I'd never get near another guy and I'd prefer to give all my attention to the one girl. You're only half as good if you have to satisfy two. lol
lol i am greedy and dont like to share. i have to have all the attention. but when im drunk, i would probably do it and feel really stupid the next day. and maybe pissed off too
So the lesson there is don't get drunk? Or if you do get drunk, wear something really tight around your hips so that you won't be able to open them and you'll be too drunk to figure out how to unlock the padlock. lol
lol i solve all those problems by only drinking with close friends. so no need for the chasity belt
No threesomes for me. I absolutely will not share the guy i'm with. The pleasure with no measure i'll provide is for him and only him. so, :p to whoever wants to join us. dream on!
To poster number 2, a threesome is only two girls and one guy. Two guys and one girl is called a train, not a threesome. Isn't learning fun kiddies?
I personally wouldn't really want to do it. My style is just too atentive for me to pay atention to two girls. One girl is hard enough to satisfy, I can't imagine having to please two.
Okay, since we have a smart arse in the room, let's get technical. A threesome can be three people of "any" gender having sex similtaniously. A train is usually seven or more men each having "individual" sex with a single woman. They wait in a line, hense the term train. You see the key difference? I advise you to do your homework before embarrassing yourself in a public forum, young man.
o my! threesm? that's not in my sex dictionary at all.
I'm a possessive bastard. I want my girl all mine and mine alone. and I'll be the same to her.
Raaj.
I'll admit, I've been curious about threesomes. the idea has intrigued me. But it's not something I could ever actually go through with. First, I really do think the sex act is intended for two people to share. That, and even if both parties consent, it could raise so, so many issues. What if one person satisfies the guy or girl more than their own partner does? What if, even though all parties say there will be no emotional attachment, one develops? After all, sexual things can become very intimate and emotional, even when that's not planned. I think a couple who engaged in a threesome would have to have extremely deep, open and candidly honest communication with each other. But even so, I still think it's not a good idea, even if it is an interesting one.
ok, I thought when lots of men waited in a line to fuck the brains out of a chick it's called a gangbang. Or maybe that's something different. lol, I ain't sure, I've never done either one, all I know is that a threesome is two girls and a guy.
I wouldn't do it. it would end with the other girl laying face down on the floor with blood all over her and me fucking my man while I'm grinding my teeth. In other words I'd get too damn greedy. Y'all know I love my sex. I don't wanna share it with another woman. If she get's any of what should be mine, I'll flip out and whip her ass. haha
Call me horny, call me crazy, call me both, I don't give a shit. I get it when I want it and I want it all to myself. :) mmmmm
Jessie
well if your going to do it, do it when your on a trip, like pick some girl up in a bar and go do it, that way it will be with someone your never going to see again. lol
LOL @POST 11. I AGREE WITH POST 8 DEFINITION. IVE SEEN 2 PORN MOVIES & I THOUGHT DANGBANG WAS A CHICK GETTIN BAGGED BY FOUR GUYS. AND MORE THAN FOUR WOULD HAV TO BE A TRAIN. HMMM...IDK. I THOUGHT GUYS WOULD LOVE A THREESOME LIKE HAVING SEX WITH 2 CHICKS WOULD BE A DREAM COME TRUE TO THEM. LOL. I KNOW I KNOW, NOT ALL MEN THINK ALIKE. I WILL ALWAYS BE GREEDY, WOULDNT NOT EVER WANT NO B***H ON MY BED. :P
I know right? That's just how it is. You really wanna get your ass kicked that's the way to go. lol just try and screw my man while I'm trying to screw him and HOOOO nelly!
Hell no. I'm too selfish. My man is mine and all mine. :P Stevo lmao his homework.
It's a fantasy the majority of men have at one time or another. but, some things should probably stay just that. I think in the real world, it would make things very complicated. all sorts of things could go wrong, especially the whole jealousy angle. I don't think I'd do it in a relationship. The only thing that would make sense would be to do it with a female bisexual couple. But, that is unlikely outside of erotic fiction and adult films etc.
No not likely seeing how most women feel about it. Smile. I don't think one person can please another more or less. People are different and if you are willing you will please, so the jealousy over that to me is void. Being a man of course I'd want to try, but finding 2 women to agree, or even a guy willing to share a girl is hard. Oh and the best way to avoid trouble is to abstain.... From drinking. Smile.
I have to disagree, willing does not mean satisfying. Just because you are willing, does not mean you are good at it. For instance, if a girl is willing to give oral sex to a guy, it does not mean she can keep her teeth out of the way. And believe me girls, if your chewing on the most sensative part of our anatomy, we aren't being satisfied. Just because your willing to do something, doesn't mean your going to do it well.
Wow, i thought i would get the opposite an ok from some..lol. Idk why tho, but this is good. I think it wouldnt be all that great cuz i rather all day wit my man then to get bored while some bitch tries to ride whats mine, haha. I be takin control, lol.
hmm... nice fanticy but heck na! I have done a 3 way with someone before, now I will pass. Heck my wife would "really get loud up in here". Shoot my wife would beet the bitch like a pemp beets his hoes! seriously then come after me while screaming my "dick!".
lol that's what I'd do. :) "mine! Get your ass over here! I ain't done yet!" Then I'd give him so much pleasure that he wouldn't wanna look at another woman again.
In short, never tried it, probably never will. Again, nothing to say that hasn't been said here already. Very well thought out post, #10, and I agree completely.
Thanks for the clarification in post 18, Cody.
Willingness means willingness to learn. A threesome is for pleasure, not for love. If you are in to your guy, or girl for love, then you'll not want to share, but on the other hand if you love your guy or girl and are comfortable with that love and that love is strongt, then you might want to play with a third for pleasure. Now their is pleasure for pleasure's sake and no love is part of it at all. It is fun, like eating a good meal. Then their is loving more then one person, and in many cultures people have more then one mate male or female. So a threesome for pleasure is not a contest for who can please me better. It is for fun, and enjoyment. Last I still believe willingness makes the grade. People are different, smell different, feel different and can be equally enjoyable, but in different ways. You don't stop eating chicken, because you had a steak right? Smile.
lol, good job explaining that Bud. :) I agree with that. It's true, everybody's different. But if I devote myself chicken I'm eating that every night, and I would hope that if my chicken found out I was at out back, he wouldn't like me much after that. But that's talking about love, not lust. :)
I personally could stick to one woman for life, but this is play, not harth and home. If you take your spouse in to a play situation you must be secure in your love, or I'd not do it. Now if you are a single person then it is play for play sake and it's not about love at all. I understand that swingers say they have stronger relationships due to the fact they never have to worry about their spouse cheating on them. You want to play we play together I have heard it explained.
Not at all sure I could do it, but I do have friends that do it and seem to enjoy it. There're a lot of people on this planet, and they're all slightly different.
I mildly contest the commonly thrown-about maxim there are many cultures who do it.
How many? Who are they?
Yes, in anthropology in college I learned of a very few preindustrial tribes who engaged in this activity once or twice a year, then there's the polygamous cultures, doubt many western women would go for that.
Just contesting the often thrown-about "there are a lot of cultures who do it ..."
where according to modern science (not that of thirty plus years ago), the human seems to be evolved as a uniquely monogamous species. Yes there are others, like wolves, who take mates for life, but the human has far more invested in monogamy - our young are totally helpless at birth and, unlike most mammals, benefit from more than one caregiver in the home for many years of development. You don't need science for that, just ask any single mom. I never knew just how rough they had it till my wife started helping them out a few years back.
So, do what one will, but it's hardly a move back to tribal society, or a move back to nature as the hippies used to call it. It's strikingly modern, with the uniquely human need to attach historical significance to it, fictional or otherwise.
In truth, historically women were granted little choice in the matter. Modern anthropology seems to counter the thinking of even fifteen years ago that women at one point were the superior gender, or that polyandry - two or more men with one woman - ever really existed before the industrial revolution.
The thought has intrigued me, but I doubt I'll ever do anything about it. First off, I'm happily engaged to someone and that option just isn't going to happen. Second and more importantly, I just don't think I'd have the balls, honestly. It would have to be two other women for me, as I'm heterosexual, and I'd have to be single...not to mention the fact that both women would have to be okay not only with the idea but with each other.
Nah, just not happening, and I'm happy with that. A guy can dream though.
I've heard that saying so much. A guy can dream though. lol
lol :)
Well I have done a three way, but as for a 3 some that ant ever going to happen at all. My wife and I are very happy in our personal life. Also she would kill the girl and then kill me.
oh yes i would welove each other to much
That be double murder. Lol.
I can only disappoint one girl at a time. But if one rides me and one feeds me grapes i'd be allright with that.
omg cam! lol! what if the other girl wants to feed you grass instead of grapes?
Honestly, I wouldn't mind doing a 3some, (with 2 other chicks odviously). The thought has made me curious, so yah! I'd do it! especially if I was in the middle!
odviously? that's a new one.
lol Cam. :)
But what if there melons instead of grapes?
noone said anything about perfect spelling, and, if there mellons if I were you i'd take bites out of them (if we're talking about fruit) and if not then cut them off.
hmm... 3 some, ponders a bit... well if I were still single sure, "lets do this!" Hmm me eat a lady and one giving me head. Then one playing with themselves while I fuck the other. Then switch!!!. Well I will leave this board alone before I dig myself a hole.
wow. You know what, after reading that shit I might reconsider. I'll have a threesome, but I'll make sure the other bitch is absolutely miserable. Maybe I'll make that part of the sex. Maybe I'll kick her ass while he's fucking the hell out of me. Yeah :) I'd enjoy that. lol
ummm no no no. Im a possessive bastard. I can't accept someone touching my girl and I'll be the same.
Raaj.
Hmm... some where in my deepest dream lets see, me me eating rihanna and Arrica durance letting me eat her pussy. Maybe, just maybe, another lady playing with herself in the background. lol lol :)
shoot... I have one crazy amagination!!.
Let's see, like I reallyy gotta think. Of course I would have a threesum, but I wouldn't make it a habbit. It can only happen off the circumstances of kiriosiddy and a strong atraction. But as far as how I can give pleasure while recieving. One giving me head and the other on my face. Simple
I've often fantasized about having a threesome with a couple. Not sure if I'd go through with it if the opportunity arose, but in the right situation, I just might.
Well I know that a woman and two guys is not a threesome. It has to be a guy and two girls. I wouldn't do either way, but I used to really like watching porn and fanticising about double penitration. I don't know, something about that has always been kinda ... uh, a little interesting for me I guess. :) I don't know why. I think it would be extremely painful. I think the most pleasurable way to have a threesome would be ... like someone else said: Suck the guy off while he's licking the other bitch's pussy. Hmmm, who knows. Maybe I'd still like double penitration porn. Lol, gotta go to spankwire.com again. ;)
Three is three in my thinking. Smile.
Of course you don't have to have 2 men to experience double penatration, just one and a toy. Now that a 2 and a half. Lol
MMM, I have done that. I don't think it would be the same, but I could be wrong. Lol
brings a new meaning to that show 2 and a half men, huh? That's double penitration with a dilldo and a penis, while you blow the third guy.
that was a pretty picture, scott. lol. and yes, i will never look at two and a half men the same way again.
They could easily name a porno Two and a Half Men. I'd watch it. lol
Well, I do believe in trying everything once... Maybe a bi MF couple, as I'd probably end up paying more attention to the other girl than the guy. Other than penitration, I wouldn't have much use for a guy sexually. Mmm, to have a guy inside me while a woman fondled and licked my breast... Then her giving him aural and giving me aural, connecting us that way... Either that or a female couple.
Phew, sorry, I'm not usually so explicit!
If I did a threesom, there would have to be at least one other guy. I've fantasised about a threesom with a man and woman, but I'd also love to be with two guys, so I could ride one while I sucked the other one off.
One other thing. Someone said that they would never have a three-way, but they might have a threesome. I don't think there's a difference, is there?
No!
Not sure where the misconception that a threesom is only 2 girls and a guy comes in to play. Let's say that one guy is fucking the girl from behind while she's sucking another guy off. would that really be considered a train? Personally, I'd consider it just a threesom. I wonder if it's just that a threesom with two girls gives the guy a greater sense of bragging rights. Just my musings.
haha anthony, it's stupid I know. But actually if it's a girl and more than 1 guy it's considered a gangbang, at least that's what I've understood for my very short life. I could be wrong, I'll feel stupid if I am. A threesome is strictly 1 guy and more than 1 girl. And I've never heard that there was a difference between a threesome and three-way, I've always thought they were the same thing. I could be wrong about that too, but as far as my sexual knowlege goes ...
Jessie
I've tried both 3sums with two girls and one guy, and two guys and one girl.
I have to say that i prefer two girls and one guy. the guy can provide the penetration, and the girl can satisfy other areas all at the same time. but, two guys is good too since you can get double penetration so I guess at the end both have their disadvantages and advantages.
Keep in mind this happened in a room of the guy hosting the party with tons of alcohol going around so I think things might have been different if alcohol wasn't included.
I've been in a gangbang with 3 guys and me. Never double penitrated, but it was pretty amazing. It had it's problems though, I really don't like sharing or being shared. All the guys were bi, so it was one of those things where we were all pleasuring each other. It was pretty good, but I really prefer having one person all to myself, and belonging to only one other person.
I am like Dinesh, I am a possessive fucker, I refuse to share or be shared.
Too many problems arise from threesomes, and in more cases then one might think, these can be relationship ending problems.
I think I'd like to try it with a bi female couple. That could be really intense and fun, with or without toys.
Done it and won't do it again
Keeping my personal business off public boards, but, long story short, with details eliminated, never, ever in a relationship for me. If I ever do it, all three people must be single, and neither of those three people can have *any* romantic feelings for either of the other people. End of story. thanks for reading.
To have one is at the top of my wish list. The thought of me and, two women kissing, touching, exploring. It's so quit pro quo!!